VIEW THE MOBILE VERSION of www.monophysitism.com Informational Site Network Informational
Privacy

    Home - Articles



The Problem Of The Hypostatic Union






Category: MONOPHYSITISM PAST AND PRESENT

The manner of the hypostatic union then became an urgent problem. The
Church of the fifth century was called upon to attempt a solution. Any
reading of the Gospels compelled the recognition of divine and human
elements in Christ; but speculative theology found it difficult to
reconcile that fact with the equally important fact of the unity of
person.

The theologians of the previous century had bequeathed little or no
guidance. The fifth-century Christologians were pioneers in an
unmapped region. Athanasius' great treatises on the incarnation are
hardly more than eloquent defences of the true deity and true humanity
of Christ. They contain little or no constructive Christology. Their
theme is, autos enenthropesen, hina hemeis theopoiethomen. He
maintains the fact, but does not deal with the "how." He uses the
phrase "natural union" (henosis physike), but does not attempt to
define the mode of that union.





Next: Apollinarianism

Previous: The Elemental Forms Of Christological Error Docetism And Ebionitism



Add to del.icio.us Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to Del.icio.us Add to Google Add to Twitter Add to Stumble Upon
Add to Informational Site Network
Report
Privacy
SHAREADD TO EBOOK


Viewed 2672